Just to elaborate a little… While there are certainly pro’s of an in-person conference there are also con’s. And there are quite a few pro’s of virtual conferences which we might initially overlook. There’s no point in writing an essay about it, but the core points I’d say in favour of partially or fully remote are:
- Carbon cost of long-haul flights. As informed citizens, we need to start taking this shit seriously.
- Accessibility - both in terms of time, financial cost and geography. In person only does not send a message that we are serious about fostering interest amongst junior folk, people from under-represented countries, or people with home or caring responsibilities, for example.
I just attended a talk about how scientists can play a role in global heating by @AnneEUrai. She had a great slide showing that there are a range of levels between fully in person and fully virtual. So it could make real sense to consider some hybrid model with potential for timezone-based watch parties and/or discussion groups.
Like I say, just my thoughts, very happy to hear what others think.
