Yep that’s exactly what I meant. I dont think the rate of the Poission would be much higher than n, as it would just drive down the unknown in p * r * t (i.e., r, and p if you place prior on it)
Yep that’s exactly what I meant. I dont think the rate of the Poission would be much higher than n, as it would just drive down the unknown in p * r * t (i.e., r, and p if you place prior on it)