When conda
was updated to version 22.9, the environment where PyMC was installed (among others) was broken. I remember searching the issue and finding it was due to the new conda version, so downgrading it to v4.14.0 fixed the problem. I am wondering if the issue still exists and, in case, if someone knows if the conda
team is aware of it and plans to address it.
(Full disclosure here: I wasn’t able to find any reference to the problem I faced a few weeks back when I ventured in a new search online and certainly don’t want to update conda to 22.9 to try to reproduce the issue as it wasn’t painless to downgrade and rebuild my environments…)
1 Like
Welcome!
Not sure if it helps, but many have moved to mamba for various reason (performance benefits being a big one). But I am not sure about the 22.9 version issue you referred to.
Thank you for your welcome and suggestion!
TBH, I would like to avoid having to deal with mamba
, which I believe still depends on conda
, to keep the system as tidy and neat as possible. Of course, if that’s the only way to go going forward and PyMC will require mamba
, I’ll migrate too, but for now I’d like to stick to conda
.
Back to my original question, if there is anyone who’s using conda
and that experienced the same issue I faced when upgraded to version 22.9, do you know if a solution exists and/or if the issue will be addressed in the next conda
release?
Just as a point of clarification, mamba can be installed into a conda environment if you already have conda installed, but mambaforge is (I believe) a drop-in replacement for miniconda. I don’t install conda anymore and am all the happier for it. But conda is definitely the “official” recommendation for installation of pymc, so whatever is going on should definitely be remedied.
1 Like