Problem Description:
You have a hierarchical model where you indexed data using DistrictName_Month_Year
. When splitting your dataset into train (80%) and test (20%), you randomly assigned months to either set. However, this causes a problem:
- A district in the test set might have month-year combinations that do not exist in the train set.
- Since the model has learned coefficients for specific district-month-year combinations, it struggles to predict for unseen months in the test set.
- To handle this, you assign the coefficient from the nearest available month in the training set to the missing test months.
Example of Your Approach
Dataset Before Splitting
District | Month | Year | Feature 1 | Feature 2 | Disease_Count |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 3 | 2022 | 5.1 | 7.3 | 20 |
A | 4 | 2022 | 5.5 | 7.1 | 18 |
A | 5 | 2022 | 5.6 | 7.4 | 22 |
A | 6 | 2022 | 5.8 | 7.2 | 24 |
A | 7 | 2022 | 6.0 | 7.5 | 25 |
After Splitting (Random 80-20)
- Train Set (80%) → Includes months (3, 5, 6) for District A
- Test Set (20%) → Includes months (4, 7) for District A
Since month 4 and 7 are missing in the training data, you find the closest available month from the train set and assign its learned coefficient.
For instance:
- Month 4 → Nearest available in training: Month 3 or 5
- Month 7 → Nearest available in training: Month 6
- Use these closest month coefficients to estimate missing values in the test set.
Can i Improve this approach or any other approach that i can use?